Gemelli Employment Law logo
Gemelli Employment Law logo
Executive Actions
COVID-19 U.S. Travel Restrictions & Compliance Resources

COVID-19 U.S. Travel Restrictions & Compliance Resources

Please see our updated post here: https://www.jspvisa.com/blog/2020/4/24/covid-19-related-us-travel-restrictions-amp-government-closures Updated April 3, 2020U.S. Department of State Global Level 4 Health Advisory: Issued March 19, 2020: “The Department of State...

Update on Expansion of Travel Ban 3.0

Update on Expansion of Travel Ban 3.0

On January 31, 2020, the Trump administration expanded the current Travel Ban (commonly referred to as “Travel Ban 3.0”), which has been deemed lawful by the U.S. Supreme Court, to include additional countries. As with prior versions of Travel Ban 3.0, the expansion suspends entry by preventing visa issuance to citizens and nationals of the listed countries. As the ban is a visa issuance restriction and not an entry restriction, nationals from the affected countries who already hold visas may continue to use those visas.   

Travel Ban Expanded to Include Additional Countries

Travel Ban Expanded to Include Additional Countries

On January 31, 2020, the Trump administration announced via Presidential Proclamation that, effective February 21, 2020 at 12:01 am eastern standard time, the travel ban will now apply to nationals from Burma (Myanmar), Eritrea, Kyrgyzstan, Nigeria, Sudan, and Tanzania.

Presidential Proclamation on Health Insurance for New Immigrants

Presidential Proclamation on Health Insurance for New Immigrants

Update: This Presidential Proclamation is the subject of litigation. As of Saturday, November 2, 2019, there is a nationwide temporary restraining order against the enforcement of the Proclamation.

Original post:

On Friday, October 4, 2019, President Trump issued a Presidential Proclamation entitled Presidential Proclamation on the Suspension of Entry of Immigrants Who Will Financially Burden the United States Healthcare System, which imposes a health care insurance requirement on new immigrants. Specifically, it requires applicants for immigrant visas to show the ability to purchase unsubsidized commercial health insurance within 30 days of U.S. entry.

USCIS announces final changes to cap-subject H-1B visa petition processing

USCIS announces final changes to cap-subject H-1B visa petition processing

On January 30, 2019, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) announced a final rule effective April 1, 2019 that changes the way cap-subject H-1B petitions will be processed in two ways: first, petitioners seeking to file petitions will have to register electronically with USCIS during a designated registration period; and second, the order in which cap-subject petitions are selected in years when demand exceeds supply (i.e., when a lottery is required) has been reversed.  We discussed these changes in depth when they were proposed, in our December 3, 2018 blog post.

New policy guidance drastically changes USCIS’s adjudications process, announces that denials will now result in removal (deportation) proceedings

New policy guidance drastically changes USCIS’s adjudications process, announces that denials will now result in removal (deportation) proceedings

In a pair of policy memoranda released to the public in July 2018, the Administration is drastically changing the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service’s (USCIS, formerly INS) role in adjudications. Initially formed as the immigration benefits-adjudicating sub-agency when the Department of Homeland Security took over immigration functions from the Department of Justice after 9/11, USCIS is typically involved in a very low percentage of the overall enforcement actions of the DHS agencies. (Most enforcement is done by DHS’s other immigration sub-agencies, ICE and CBP.) For example, unless fraud or criminality is suspected, USCIS traditionally has not initiated removal (deportation) proceedings in the course of adjudicating benefits applications, such as nonimmigrant and immigrant visa petitions, applications for adjustment of status to U.S. permanent residence, or naturalizations. However, in a new policy memo released on July 5, 2018 (but dated June 28), entitled Updated Guidance for the Referral of Cases and Issuance of Notices to Appear (NTAs) in Cases Involving Inadmissible and Deportable Aliens (“NTA Memo”) and effective immediately, the Administration announced that USCIS will now initiate removal proceedings in a wide variety of circumstances.

U.S. Supreme Court upholds travel ban

U.S. Supreme Court upholds travel ban

The U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) upheld the administration’s travel ban in a 5-4 decision today. The decision does not change the status quo, however, as in December 2017, SCOTUS allowed the third iteration of the travel ban to take effect during the pendency of...

Alarming Change of Policy for Treatment of Certain Status Violations for F, J, and M Visa Holders

Alarming Change of Policy for Treatment of Certain Status Violations for F, J, and M Visa Holders

On May 10, 2018, USCIS announced a draft policy memorandum titled “Accrual of Unlawful Presence and F, J, and M Nonimmigrants.” F, J, and M nonimmigrant visas are for international students, scholars, and participants in international educational/cultural exchange programs (including interns and trainees).  The draft policy is slated to become final and effective on August 9, 2018.

In the draft policy, USCIS announced a dramatic change to the treatment of “status violations” by individuals in the U.S. on F, J, and M visas. A status violation is any failure to meet a term or condition of the visa, including unknowing and unintentional technical violations (e.g., lowering one’s course load below a certain number of credit hours, engaging in casual work, accruing too many days of non-work after school completion, etc.).

Statement on Family Separation

Statement on Family Separation

Dear Clients, Friends, and Community –Like many of you, we are shocked at the administration’s treatment of asylum seekers and in particular the separation of families at the border. Seeking asylum is not a crime. There is no law preventing families from staying...