Updated 8/19/2020Disclaimer: Any foreign national considering international travel should have an attorney review the particular circumstances of their case as there are currently several “bans” in effect. H-1B Cap:On August 14, 2020, USCIS ran a second lottery on...
November 5, 2020 update:On Wednesday, November 4, 2020, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeal stayed the lower court’s order. Therefore Public Charge is back in effect for now. November 3, 2020 update:On Monday, November 2, 2020, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern...
On July 14, 2020, President Trump issued Executive Order (EO 13936) that ends the special treatment of Hong Kong as a separate foreign state from China. The immigration impact to Hong Kong nationals is significant. For the permanent residence (i.e. green card)...
Updated 7/29/2020Disclaimer: Any foreign national considering international travel should have an attorney review the particular circumstances of their case as there are currently several “bans” in effect. Presidential Proclamations: As detailed in our continually...
Presidential Proclamation: As noted in our blog post, the April 22, 2020 Presidential Proclamation regarding immigration affects only consular processing immigrant visa cases, with certain exceptions. Nonimmigrant visas and statuses are unaffected; PERM, I-140,...
June 9, 2020 update:
Regarding the possible extension of the April 22, 2020 Proclamation to include other high-tech visas or F-1 OPT, rumors are that a new travel and/or visa issuance ban for certain visa types (possibly new H-1Bs, L-1s, and J-1s) may be announced the week of June 15, and that other regulatory changes (which must go through Notice and Comment periods) may be announced in July. The situation is very fluid, nothing is confirmed, and we will post here if and when there are more details.
Updated May 29, 2020Presidential Proclamation: As noted in our blog post on April 22, the new Presidential Proclamation regarding immigration affects only consular processing immigrant visa cases, with certain exceptions. Nonimmigrant visas and statuses are...
As previously posted, on Monday, January 27, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court granted the administration’s request for a stay of the nationwide injunction against the administration’s public charge rule, which cleared a path for the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) to implement the public charge rule within the United States starting on February 24, 2020.
The new rule drastically changes the standard by which a foreign national is determined to be “likely at any time to become a public charge” (and consequently inadmissible to the U.S.), and affects not only family-based but also employment-based filings.
As described in a prior post, on May 10, 2018, USCIS announced a policy memorandum titled “Accrual of Unlawful Presence and F, J, and M Nonimmigrants” (“memo” or “unlawful presence memo”). This memo was finalized on August 9, 2018. As background, F, J, and M nonimmigrant visas are for international students, scholars, and participants in international educational/cultural exchange programs (including interns and trainees). In brief, the memorandum would have changed the start of accrual of “unlawful presence” for F, J, and M nonimmigrants from the day after DHS made a formal finding that the individual violated their nonimmigrant status to the day after the individual engaged in an unauthorized activity. Unlawful presence often has serious, irreversible consequences such as bars to re-entry to the United States. This memo essentially undid years of law and policy that allow for notice and due process before a bar is applied.
The memo has been the subject of litigation, and on February 6, 2020, in the case of Guilford College et al. v. Chad Wolf, U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al., No. 1:18CV891 (M.D. N.C. Feb. 6, 2020), the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina granted the Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment and issued a permanent, nationwide injunction enjoining USCIS from enforcing the memo
